The desire for separation is the strongest desire.
And it’s funny because it’s true.
Out of that desire forms agreement and disagreement. Peace and War. Another example of Yin and Yang.
Implied Consent is an unspoken agreement with other people, the creation, or their god.
A crude example I like to give is if I were to slap a random individual in the back of the head, I consent, it’s implied, for someone or “something” to slap me in the back of head.
That which consents to war, consents to war.
This was expressed in the Christian Tradition
For all who take up the sword shall perish by the sword – Matthew 26:52
Implied consent is easy to learn but extremely hard to master. It’s complicated, because the rules change as one moves up and down, ascends and descends, experiencing the rise and fall of the engine which is The Reality.
By what exists within my heart or by what exists within my actions, what am I consenting to?
In the Hindu Tradition this is explained by the concept of Karma, cause and effect.
But what is the cause? Is their god the cause? Are they as an individual the cause? Or is something outside of themselves in the creation that is the cause?
It depends on the Logos (fundamental logic and reasoning) one is currently operating under.
The problem is this is constantly changing because of the desire for separation, which moves the engine of The Reality. The problem is that it’s not a one size fits all phenomenon, it never was, and it can’t possibly be. This is because the strongest desire is for separation. This is why we have so many religions, and within that, so many different interpretations of those religions.
The rules that apply to me, may or may not, apply to you.
And because of this, people are constantly arguing about what they should do or what other people should do with their lives. Again, this is created by the desire for separation.
It’s impossible for there to be one universal truth, unless we view truth as a constantly evolving and changing relationship, which could make sense. But to define what that is or suggest that it’s the same for everyone, would break the engine that is the reality.
What is the root of suffering? Why does illness exist? How is it possible to fall in love?
Again, the reasoning is not universal, if it was, the whole engine that is the reality would fail.
Everything is changing, including where people are within the Engine that is the Reality. It has to be this way, or separation couldn’t exist, which again, is the strongest desire.
