I have this image here, but the symbol is problematic. The reasoning is because we have a left and a right. The left is the right and the right is the left. It’s one thing coexisting. If you saw them being on the same side, working together it might make more sense, if you can see that it is two opposing sides of one energy.
The desire for separation is the strongest desire. This fuel and motivation provides the desire to rationalize and justify existence. The Logos being a thing is temporary, like all aspects of creation. However it’s eternal when you think of it as an existence, similar to an Observer which carries a temporary Identity. Nothing is truly eternal except the process itself, the engine that is The Reality.
Different interpretations of the Logos come into being. This is what creates different religions. They often have a trinity. But all forms of existence hold the potential for its opposite and thus generating it. Ultimately it is two sides of the same coin.
The Christ and The Anti-Christ are an example. Why does it have to have an adversary? Because the opposite of any idea is generated automatically. Two forces come together, like a chemical reaction, thus creating a new product. That new product itself then again generates its opposite. And the cycle continues indefinitely.
We could perceive that creation is nothing more than a chemical reaction that is in constant motion.
The identity itself is the product of this reaction. It’s not real in that it is temporary, it changes. It’s experienced as real but it changes so it is not eternal, only the process is eternal.
The identity is merely a product of the creation. The Creation could not exist without The Identity, and vice versa. Same with The Reality. All three co-exists simultaneously. Yet again, just another trinity.
The Gospel of Thomas, verse 22, was trying to explain this reaction in their own way.
When you make the two one, and when you make the inside like the outside and the outside like the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the male and the female one and the same, so that the male not be male nor the female; and when you fashion eyes in the place of an eye, and a hand in place of a hand, and a foot in place of a foot, and a likeness in place of a likeness; then will you enter the kingdom.
It’s easier to understand if you think of energies. Masculine energy and Feminine energy.
The only problem with this whole thing is that the Kingdom will eventually get invaded or fall in love with another Kingdom, starting the process all over again.
There is a time for Peace and there is a time for War. This is just creation which again can be perceived as nothing more than a chemical reaction.
I talk about the identity being temporary and held together by a bipolar field. Two sides of the same coin. Fear and Desire. It’s the same energy, just that there are things you like about it and there are things you dislike about it.
I used to model this as being two poles, think of bipolar, where each side represents a Logos. The two competing logos, which are one coin, are energies. In my experience they compete for the observer through questions trying to create agreement between the two parties. Agreement would be peace, which then creates a new product that starts another war.
But to understand that you’d have to see war and intercourse being fundamentally the same thing.
The whole thing is kind of comical. I like to say that it’s funny because it’s true.
